Vermont
Northeast
State Power #49/51Per-capita #36
State Power
11.0
of 100 · #49
SPI
11.0
SCC
30.8
SDI
33.3
Pillar profile
Talent35.0
Capital16.7
Research30.8
Infrastructure38.2
Agentic33.3
Report · generated from Vermont's indicators
Vermont — standing in full
Vermont is the #51 state by economic size ($40bn GSP) and ranks #49/51 on absolute State Power and #36/51 on per-capita intensity. No pillar stands out as a clear strength; the binding concern is capital.
Economic & scale context
GDP
$40bn
#51 of 51
GDP / capita
$62k
Population
0.7M
AI investment
$0.4bn
#48 of 51
Notable AI orgs
7
Index & pillar read
| Index / pillar | Value | Standing | What a high vs low value means — and where Vermont sits |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPI State Power | 11.0 | Lagging · #49/51 | Low here — limited absolute weight — a smaller node leaning on capacity built in larger states. ▲ high: a heavyweight that anchors national AI capacity and pulls in capital and talent · ▼ low: limited absolute weight — a smaller node leaning on capacity built in larger states |
| SCC State Coefficient | 30.8 | Developing · #36/51 | Low here — thin intensity per resident — capability is sparse relative to population. ▲ high: deep capability per resident — a concentrated, high-intensity AI economy · ▼ low: thin intensity per resident — capability is sparse relative to population |
| SDI State Agentic | 33.3 | Developing · #36/51 | Low here — agentic deployment is shallow — the local agent lever is under-used. ▲ high: agents are widely deployed locally — a near-term productivity multiplier · ▼ low: agentic deployment is shallow — the local agent lever is under-used |
| Talent Talent | 35.0 | Moderate · #28/51 | Mid-pack. High would mean a deep talent pool — the scarcest input to building AI; low would mean a shallow talent base that constrains how much can be built locally. ▲ high: a deep talent pool — the scarcest input to building AI · ▼ low: a shallow talent base that constrains how much can be built locally |
| Capital Capital | 16.7 | Developing · #38/51 | Low here — thin investment — good ideas struggle to scale locally. ▲ high: abundant capital flowing into building cognitive infrastructure · ▼ low: thin investment — good ideas struggle to scale locally |
| Research Research | 30.8 | Moderate · #33/51 | Mid-pack. High would mean a strong research base feeding a pipeline of ideas and people; low would mean a weak research base — fewer home-grown breakthroughs and spinouts. ▲ high: a strong research base feeding a pipeline of ideas and people · ▼ low: a weak research base — fewer home-grown breakthroughs and spinouts |
| Infrastructure Infrastructure | 38.2 | Developing · #34/51 | Low here — infrastructure gaps cap how much AI can actually be run locally. ▲ high: the physical and digital rails to run AI at scale are in place · ▼ low: infrastructure gaps cap how much AI can actually be run locally |
| Agentic Agentic | 33.3 | Developing · #36/51 | Low here — little agentic deployment — the near-term lever is unused. ▲ high: agents are actively deployed — an early-mover productivity edge · ▼ low: little agentic deployment — the near-term lever is unused |
Strengths to build on
- No pillar stands out as a clear strength yet.
Risk factors
- Binding weakness — Capital 16.7 (#38/51, Developing): thin investment — good ideas struggle to scale locally.
▲
State values are curated v1 estimates on a consistent scale — not yet measured sub-national data.