CognitiveAristocracy
Detail
Overview / Regions / Provo

Provo

US Power #143/162Per-capita #85National view: United States →
Metro Power
24.7
of 100 · #143
MPI
24.7
MCC
44.6
MDI
43.7

Pillar profile

Talent45.6
Capital33.9
Research33.2
Infrastructure66.7
Agentic43.7

Indicators

  • Population (m)0.7
  • GDP ($bn)45
  • GDP per capita ($k)63
  • AI investment ($bn)1.5
  • Tech employment %10.5
  • AI talent56
  • Research strength58
  • Notable AI orgs13
  • Compute / data centers60
  • Broadband %93
  • Tertiary degree %44
  • Digital skills70
  • Startup ecosystem66
  • Agent adoption48
  • Patents / 100k30

Nearest peers

Metro report · generated from Provo's indicators

Provo — metro standing in full

Provo is the #142 metro by economic size ($45bn) in the panel and ranks #143/162 on absolute Metro Power and #85/162 on per-capita intensity. No pillar stands out as a clear strength; the binding concern is research. Locally it runs below the United States national average (MCC 44.6 vs CC 86.7).

National context: United States scores CC 86.7 per-capita; Provo sits at MCC 44.6.

Economic & scale context curated v1 estimate

GDP (metro)
$45bn
#142 of 162
GDP / capita
$63k
Population
0.7M
AI investment
$1.5bn
#108 of 162
Notable AI orgs
13

Index & pillar read

For each metro index and pillar: what it means when high (the value) versus low (the gap), and Provo's own standing.

Index / pillarValueStandingWhat a high vs low value means — and where Provo sits
MPI Metro Power24.7Lagging · #143/162Low here — limited absolute weight — a smaller node that leans on capacity built in larger hubs.
▲ high: a heavyweight hub where capital, talent and AI organizations concentrate — it can anchor an entire national AI ecosystem  ·  ▼ low: limited absolute weight — a smaller node that leans on capacity built in larger hubs
MCC Metro Coefficient44.6Moderate · #85/162Mid-pack. High would mean deep capability per resident — a concentrated, high-intensity ecosystem; low would mean thin intensity per resident — capability is sparse relative to the population.
▲ high: deep capability per resident — a concentrated, high-intensity ecosystem  ·  ▼ low: thin intensity per resident — capability is sparse relative to the population
MDI Metro Agentic43.7Moderate · #72/162Mid-pack. High would mean agents are widely deployed locally — a near-term productivity multiplier; low would mean agentic deployment is shallow — the local agent lever is under-used.
▲ high: agents are widely deployed locally — a near-term productivity multiplier  ·  ▼ low: agentic deployment is shallow — the local agent lever is under-used
Talent Talent45.6Moderate · #70/162Mid-pack. High would mean a deep talent pool — the scarcest input to building AI; low would mean a shallow talent base that constrains how much can be built locally.
▲ high: a deep talent pool — the scarcest input to building AI  ·  ▼ low: a shallow talent base that constrains how much can be built locally
Capital Capital33.9Moderate · #77/162Mid-pack. High would mean abundant capital flowing into building cognitive infrastructure; low would mean thin investment — good ideas struggle to scale locally.
▲ high: abundant capital flowing into building cognitive infrastructure  ·  ▼ low: thin investment — good ideas struggle to scale locally
Research Research33.2Developing · #106/162Low here — a weak research base — fewer home-grown breakthroughs and spinouts.
▲ high: a strong research base feeding a pipeline of ideas and people  ·  ▼ low: a weak research base — fewer home-grown breakthroughs and spinouts
Infrastructure Infrastructure66.7Moderate · #79/162Mid-pack. High would mean the physical and digital rails to run AI at scale are in place; low would mean infrastructure gaps cap how much AI can actually be run locally.
▲ high: the physical and digital rails to run AI at scale are in place  ·  ▼ low: infrastructure gaps cap how much AI can actually be run locally
Agentic Agentic43.7Moderate · #72/162Mid-pack. High would mean agents are actively deployed — an early-mover productivity edge; low would mean little agentic deployment — the near-term lever is unused.
▲ high: agents are actively deployed — an early-mover productivity edge  ·  ▼ low: little agentic deployment — the near-term lever is unused

Strengths to build on

  • No pillar stands out as a clear strength yet.

Risk factors

  • Binding weakness — Research 33.2 (#106/162, Developing): a weak research base — fewer home-grown breakthroughs and spinouts.
Metro values are curated estimates (v1) on a consistent global scale — not yet measured sub-national data.