CognitiveAristocracy
Detail
Overview / Regions / Austin

Austin

US Power #47/162Per-capita #10National view: United States →
Metro Power
54.3
of 100 · #47
MPI
54.3
MCC
67.2
MDI
68.7

Pillar profile

Talent63.6
Capital60.8
Research61.1
Infrastructure81.7
Agentic68.7

Indicators

  • Population (m)2.4
  • GDP ($bn)230
  • GDP per capita ($k)95.0
  • AI investment ($bn)15
  • Tech employment %18
  • AI talent72
  • Research strength78
  • Notable AI orgs28
  • Compute / data centers74
  • Broadband %94
  • Tertiary degree %48
  • Digital skills86
  • Startup ecosystem78
  • Agent adoption72
  • Patents / 100k190

Nearest peers

Metro report · generated from Austin's indicators

Austin — metro standing in full

Austin is the #54 metro by economic size ($230bn) in the panel and ranks #47/162 on absolute Metro Power and #10/162 on per-capita intensity. Its strongest pillar is Agentic (68.7, Leading); no single pillar is a binding weakness. Locally it runs below the United States national average (MCC 67.2 vs CC 86.7).

National context: United States scores CC 86.7 per-capita; Austin sits at MCC 67.2.

Economic & scale context ● US Census ACS-1 2022 (population); GDP curated

GDP (metro)
$230bn
#54 of 162
GDP / capita
$95k
Population
2.4M
AI investment
$15.0bn
#10 of 162
Notable AI orgs
28

Index & pillar read

For each metro index and pillar: what it means when high (the value) versus low (the gap), and Austin's own standing.

Index / pillarValueStandingWhat a high vs low value means — and where Austin sits
MPI Metro Power54.3Strong · #47/162High here — a heavyweight hub where capital, talent and AI organizations concentrate — it can anchor an entire national AI ecosystem.
▲ high: a heavyweight hub where capital, talent and AI organizations concentrate — it can anchor an entire national AI ecosystem  ·  ▼ low: limited absolute weight — a smaller node that leans on capacity built in larger hubs
MCC Metro Coefficient67.2Leading · #10/162High here — deep capability per resident — a concentrated, high-intensity ecosystem.
▲ high: deep capability per resident — a concentrated, high-intensity ecosystem  ·  ▼ low: thin intensity per resident — capability is sparse relative to the population
MDI Metro Agentic68.7Leading · #7/162High here — agents are widely deployed locally — a near-term productivity multiplier.
▲ high: agents are widely deployed locally — a near-term productivity multiplier  ·  ▼ low: agentic deployment is shallow — the local agent lever is under-used
Talent Talent63.6Leading · #11/162High here — a deep talent pool — the scarcest input to building AI.
▲ high: a deep talent pool — the scarcest input to building AI  ·  ▼ low: a shallow talent base that constrains how much can be built locally
Capital Capital60.8Leading · #10/162High here — abundant capital flowing into building cognitive infrastructure.
▲ high: abundant capital flowing into building cognitive infrastructure  ·  ▼ low: thin investment — good ideas struggle to scale locally
Research Research61.1Strong · #21/162High here — a strong research base feeding a pipeline of ideas and people.
▲ high: a strong research base feeding a pipeline of ideas and people  ·  ▼ low: a weak research base — fewer home-grown breakthroughs and spinouts
Infrastructure Infrastructure81.7Leading · #10/162High here — the physical and digital rails to run AI at scale are in place.
▲ high: the physical and digital rails to run AI at scale are in place  ·  ▼ low: infrastructure gaps cap how much AI can actually be run locally
Agentic Agentic68.7Leading · #7/162High here — agents are actively deployed — an early-mover productivity edge.
▲ high: agents are actively deployed — an early-mover productivity edge  ·  ▼ low: little agentic deployment — the near-term lever is unused

Strengths to build on

  • Agentic (68.7, Leading) — agents are actively deployed — an early-mover productivity edge.
  • Capital (60.8, Leading) — abundant capital flowing into building cognitive infrastructure.
  • Infrastructure (81.7, Leading) — the physical and digital rails to run AI at scale are in place.

Risk factors

  • No acute structural gaps stand out across the metro pillars.
Metro values are curated estimates (v1) on a consistent global scale — not yet measured sub-national data.