Tiff Macklem
All peopleInfluence report · generated from Tiff Macklem's indicators
Tiff Macklem — full AI read
Tiff Macklem — Governor, Bank of Canada (Canada) — ranks #483/635 on the Power & Influence Index (41.4). Greatest lever: Institutional control (82.0, Strong). Entrenchment 62/100; net worth $0bn.
Role
Governor, Bank of Canada
Country
Canada
Category
Finance & markets
Net worth / capital
$0bn
Controls
Central banking, monetary policy, G7 financial coordination
Dimension read
| Dimension | Value | Standing | What a high vs low value means — and where Tiff Macklem sits |
|---|---|---|---|
| PII Power & Influence (PII) | 41.4 | Developing · #479/635 | Low here — lower relative influence within this elite set. ▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence · ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set |
| Economic power Economic power | 64.0 | Moderate · #249/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean controls vast wealth and companies; low would mean limited economic control. ▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies · ▼ low: limited economic control |
| Political power Political power | 46.0 | Moderate · #374/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean commands states, law or policy; low would mean little formal political power. ▲ high: commands states, law or policy · ▼ low: little formal political power |
| AI power AI power | 12.0 | Lagging · #578/635 | Low here — limited sway over AI's direction. ▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI · ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction |
| Platform reach Platform reach | 26.0 | Lagging · #603/635 | Low here — limited direct reach. ▲ high: commands a vast audience or network · ▼ low: limited direct reach |
| Institutional control Institutional control | 82.0 | Strong · #88/635 | High here — controls pivotal institutions and capital. ▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital · ▼ low: limited institutional control |
| Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure | 62.0 | Moderate · #319/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake); low would mean power is contingent — term-limited or contestable. ▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake) · ▼ low: power is contingent — term-limited or contestable |
Strengths
- Institutional control (82.0, Strong) — controls pivotal institutions and capital.
Risk factors
- Significant but balanced influence with no single dominant lever.
▲
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.