Sergey Levine
All peopleInfluence report · generated from Sergey Levine's indicators
Sergey Levine — full AI read
Sergey Levine — Professor, UC Berkeley; co-founder Physical Intelligence (United States) — ranks #554/635 on the Power & Influence Index (38.5). Greatest lever: AI power (76.0, Leading). Entrenchment 68/100; net worth $0bn.
Role
Professor, UC Berkeley; co-founder Physical Intelligence
Country
United States
Category
AI researcher/lab
Net worth / capital
$0bn
Controls
Robotics, embodied AI, robot foundation models
Dimension read
| Dimension | Value | Standing | What a high vs low value means — and where Sergey Levine sits |
|---|---|---|---|
| PII Power & Influence (PII) | 38.5 | Developing · #553/635 | Low here — lower relative influence within this elite set. ▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence · ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set |
| Economic power Economic power | 35.0 | Lagging · #570/635 | Low here — limited economic control. ▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies · ▼ low: limited economic control |
| Political power Political power | 9.0 | Lagging · #632/635 | Low here — little formal political power. ▲ high: commands states, law or policy · ▼ low: little formal political power |
| AI power AI power | 76.0 | Leading · #60/635 | High here — shapes or controls the trajectory of AI. ▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI · ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction |
| Platform reach Platform reach | 38.0 | Developing · #498/635 | Low here — limited direct reach. ▲ high: commands a vast audience or network · ▼ low: limited direct reach |
| Institutional control Institutional control | 55.0 | Developing · #517/635 | Low here — limited institutional control. ▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital · ▼ low: limited institutional control |
| Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure | 68.0 | Moderate · #233/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake); low would mean power is contingent — term-limited or contestable. ▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake) · ▼ low: power is contingent — term-limited or contestable |
Strengths
- AI power (76.0, Leading) — shapes or controls the trajectory of AI.
Risk factors
- Significant but balanced influence with no single dominant lever.
▲
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.