CognitiveAristocracy
Detail
Overview / Rankings / People / Salim Ramji

Salim Ramji

All people
Influence report · generated from Salim Ramji's indicators

Salim Ramji — full AI read

Salim Ramji — CEO, The Vanguard Group (United States) — ranks #97/635 on the Power & Influence Index (60.3). Greatest lever: Institutional control (86.0, Leading). Entrenchment 76/100.

Role
CEO, The Vanguard Group
Country
United States
Category
Investor/financier
Net worth / capital
Controls
Index asset management; $12T AUM; corporate voting power

Dimension read

DimensionValueStandingWhat a high vs low value means — and where Salim Ramji sits
PII Power & Influence (PII)60.3Strong · #97/635High here — near the apex of civilizational influence.
▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence  ·  ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set
Economic power Economic power84.0Leading · #36/635High here — controls vast wealth and companies.
▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies  ·  ▼ low: limited economic control
Political power Political power50.0Moderate · #312/635Mid-pack. High would mean commands states, law or policy; low would mean little formal political power.
▲ high: commands states, law or policy  ·  ▼ low: little formal political power
AI power AI power52.0Moderate · #247/635Mid-pack. High would mean shapes or controls the trajectory of AI; low would mean limited sway over AI's direction.
▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI  ·  ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction
Platform reach Platform reach50.0Moderate · #305/635Mid-pack. High would mean commands a vast audience or network; low would mean limited direct reach.
▲ high: commands a vast audience or network  ·  ▼ low: limited direct reach
Institutional control Institutional control86.0Leading · #33/635High here — controls pivotal institutions and capital.
▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital  ·  ▼ low: limited institutional control
Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure76.0Strong · #132/635High here — power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake).
▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake)  ·  ▼ low: power is contingent — term-limited or contestable

Strengths

  • Institutional control (86.0, Leading) — controls pivotal institutions and capital.
  • Economic power (84.0, Leading) — controls vast wealth and companies.
  • Entrenchment / tenure (76.0, Strong) — power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake).

Risk factors

  • Significant but balanced influence with no single dominant lever.
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.