CognitiveAristocracy
Detail
Overview / Rankings / People / Salil Parekh

Salil Parekh

All people
Influence report · generated from Salil Parekh's indicators

Salil Parekh — full AI read

Salil Parekh — CEO, Infosys (India) — ranks #177/635 on the Power & Influence Index (54.2). Greatest lever: AI power (60.0, Strong). Entrenchment 64/100; net worth $0bn.

Role
CEO, Infosys
Country
India
Category
Tech & AI executive
Net worth / capital
$0bn
Controls
IT services, enterprise AI, digital transformation

Dimension read

DimensionValueStandingWhat a high vs low value means — and where Salil Parekh sits
PII Power & Influence (PII)54.2Strong · #174/635High here — near the apex of civilizational influence.
▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence  ·  ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set
Economic power Economic power68.0Strong · #190/635High here — controls vast wealth and companies.
▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies  ·  ▼ low: limited economic control
Political power Political power44.0Moderate · #403/635Mid-pack. High would mean commands states, law or policy; low would mean little formal political power.
▲ high: commands states, law or policy  ·  ▼ low: little formal political power
AI power AI power60.0Strong · #188/635High here — shapes or controls the trajectory of AI.
▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI  ·  ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction
Platform reach Platform reach54.0Moderate · #256/635Mid-pack. High would mean commands a vast audience or network; low would mean limited direct reach.
▲ high: commands a vast audience or network  ·  ▼ low: limited direct reach
Institutional control Institutional control74.0Moderate · #232/635Mid-pack. High would mean controls pivotal institutions and capital; low would mean limited institutional control.
▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital  ·  ▼ low: limited institutional control
Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure64.0Moderate · #296/635Mid-pack. High would mean power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake); low would mean power is contingent — term-limited or contestable.
▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake)  ·  ▼ low: power is contingent — term-limited or contestable

Strengths

  • AI power (60.0, Strong) — shapes or controls the trajectory of AI.
  • Economic power (68.0, Strong) — controls vast wealth and companies.

Risk factors

  • Significant but balanced influence with no single dominant lever.
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.