Jonathan Ross
All peopleInfluence report · generated from Jonathan Ross's indicators
Jonathan Ross — full AI read
Jonathan Ross — Founder & CEO, Groq (TPU inventor) (United States) — ranks #286/635 on the Power & Influence Index (49.1). Greatest lever: AI power (76.0, Leading). Entrenchment 62/100; net worth $1bn.
Role
Founder & CEO, Groq (TPU inventor)
Country
United States
Category
Tech & AI executive
Net worth / capital
$1bn
Controls
AI inference chips, LPU, fast inference
Dimension read
| Dimension | Value | Standing | What a high vs low value means — and where Jonathan Ross sits |
|---|---|---|---|
| PII Power & Influence (PII) | 49.1 | Moderate · #285/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean near the apex of civilizational influence; low would mean lower relative influence within this elite set. ▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence · ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set |
| Economic power Economic power | 58.0 | Moderate · #326/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean controls vast wealth and companies; low would mean limited economic control. ▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies · ▼ low: limited economic control |
| Political power Political power | 34.0 | Developing · #505/635 | Low here — little formal political power. ▲ high: commands states, law or policy · ▼ low: little formal political power |
| AI power AI power | 76.0 | Leading · #60/635 | High here — shapes or controls the trajectory of AI. ▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI · ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction |
| Platform reach Platform reach | 50.0 | Moderate · #305/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean commands a vast audience or network; low would mean limited direct reach. ▲ high: commands a vast audience or network · ▼ low: limited direct reach |
| Institutional control Institutional control | 54.0 | Developing · #524/635 | Low here — limited institutional control. ▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital · ▼ low: limited institutional control |
| Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure | 62.0 | Moderate · #319/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake); low would mean power is contingent — term-limited or contestable. ▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake) · ▼ low: power is contingent — term-limited or contestable |
Strengths
- AI power (76.0, Leading) — shapes or controls the trajectory of AI.
Risk factors
- Significant but balanced influence with no single dominant lever.
▲
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.