Jakub Pachocki
All peopleInfluence report · generated from Jakub Pachocki's indicators
Jakub Pachocki — full AI read
Jakub Pachocki — Chief Scientist, OpenAI (Poland) — ranks #252/635 on the Power & Influence Index (51.1). Greatest lever: AI power (86.0, Leading). Entrenchment 60/100; net worth $0bn.
Role
Chief Scientist, OpenAI
Country
Poland
Category
AI researcher/lab
Net worth / capital
$0bn
Controls
frontier AI research, reasoning models, AGI
Dimension read
| Dimension | Value | Standing | What a high vs low value means — and where Jakub Pachocki sits |
|---|---|---|---|
| PII Power & Influence (PII) | 51.1 | Moderate · #252/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean near the apex of civilizational influence; low would mean lower relative influence within this elite set. ▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence · ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set |
| Economic power Economic power | 48.0 | Developing · #470/635 | Low here — limited economic control. ▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies · ▼ low: limited economic control |
| Political power Political power | 34.0 | Developing · #505/635 | Low here — little formal political power. ▲ high: commands states, law or policy · ▼ low: little formal political power |
| AI power AI power | 86.0 | Leading · #12/635 | High here — shapes or controls the trajectory of AI. ▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI · ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction |
| Platform reach Platform reach | 48.0 | Moderate · #362/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean commands a vast audience or network; low would mean limited direct reach. ▲ high: commands a vast audience or network · ▼ low: limited direct reach |
| Institutional control Institutional control | 70.0 | Moderate · #281/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean controls pivotal institutions and capital; low would mean limited institutional control. ▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital · ▼ low: limited institutional control |
| Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure | 60.0 | Moderate · #371/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake); low would mean power is contingent — term-limited or contestable. ▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake) · ▼ low: power is contingent — term-limited or contestable |
Strengths
- AI power (86.0, Leading) — shapes or controls the trajectory of AI.
Risk factors
- A pivotal shaper of AI's direction — outsized leverage over how the technology develops.
▲
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.