Haitham al-Ghais
All peopleInfluence report · generated from Haitham al-Ghais's indicators
Haitham al-Ghais — full AI read
Haitham al-Ghais — Secretary General, OPEC (KWT) — ranks #392/635 on the Power & Influence Index (45.0). Greatest lever: Economic power (70.0, Strong). Entrenchment 60/100; net worth $1bn.
Role
Secretary General, OPEC
Country
KWT
Category
Industry & energy
Net worth / capital
$1bn
Controls
Oil cartel coordination, global oil prices, energy diplomacy
Dimension read
| Dimension | Value | Standing | What a high vs low value means — and where Haitham al-Ghais sits |
|---|---|---|---|
| PII Power & Influence (PII) | 45.0 | Moderate · #392/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean near the apex of civilizational influence; low would mean lower relative influence within this elite set. ▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence · ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set |
| Economic power Economic power | 70.0 | Strong · #155/635 | High here — controls vast wealth and companies. ▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies · ▼ low: limited economic control |
| Political power Political power | 58.0 | Moderate · #191/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean commands states, law or policy; low would mean little formal political power. ▲ high: commands states, law or policy · ▼ low: little formal political power |
| AI power AI power | 8.0 | Lagging · #626/635 | Low here — limited sway over AI's direction. ▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI · ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction |
| Platform reach Platform reach | 40.0 | Developing · #453/635 | Low here — limited direct reach. ▲ high: commands a vast audience or network · ▼ low: limited direct reach |
| Institutional control Institutional control | 75.0 | Moderate · #227/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean controls pivotal institutions and capital; low would mean limited institutional control. ▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital · ▼ low: limited institutional control |
| Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure | 60.0 | Moderate · #371/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake); low would mean power is contingent — term-limited or contestable. ▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake) · ▼ low: power is contingent — term-limited or contestable |
Strengths
- Economic power (70.0, Strong) — controls vast wealth and companies.
Risk factors
- Significant but balanced influence with no single dominant lever.
▲
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.