George Soros
All peopleInfluence report · generated from George Soros's indicators
George Soros — full AI read
George Soros — Founder, Open Society Foundations; Soros Fund Management (United States) — ranks #67/635 on the Power & Influence Index (62.8). Greatest lever: Institutional control (85.0, Leading). Entrenchment 72/100; net worth $7bn.
Role
Founder, Open Society Foundations; Soros Fund Management
Country
United States
Category
Investor/financier
Net worth / capital
$7bn
Controls
Pro-democracy philanthropy, political funding, macro finance, civil society networks
Dimension read
| Dimension | Value | Standing | What a high vs low value means — and where George Soros sits |
|---|---|---|---|
| PII Power & Influence (PII) | 62.8 | Strong · #67/635 | High here — near the apex of civilizational influence. ▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence · ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set |
| Economic power Economic power | 72.0 | Strong · #127/635 | High here — controls vast wealth and companies. ▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies · ▼ low: limited economic control |
| Political power Political power | 70.0 | Strong · #65/635 | High here — commands states, law or policy. ▲ high: commands states, law or policy · ▼ low: little formal political power |
| AI power AI power | 40.0 | Moderate · #333/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean shapes or controls the trajectory of AI; low would mean limited sway over AI's direction. ▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI · ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction |
| Platform reach Platform reach | 75.0 | Strong · #64/635 | High here — commands a vast audience or network. ▲ high: commands a vast audience or network · ▼ low: limited direct reach |
| Institutional control Institutional control | 85.0 | Leading · #48/635 | High here — controls pivotal institutions and capital. ▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital · ▼ low: limited institutional control |
| Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure | 72.0 | Strong · #163/635 | High here — power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake). ▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake) · ▼ low: power is contingent — term-limited or contestable |
Strengths
- Institutional control (85.0, Leading) — controls pivotal institutions and capital.
- Platform reach (75.0, Strong) — commands a vast audience or network.
- Political power (70.0, Strong) — commands states, law or policy.
Risk factors
- Significant but balanced influence with no single dominant lever.
▲
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.