CognitiveAristocracy
Detail
Overview / Rankings / People / Filippo Grandi

Filippo Grandi

All people
Influence report · generated from Filippo Grandi's indicators

Filippo Grandi — full AI read

Filippo Grandi — United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (Italy) — ranks #534/635 on the Power & Influence Index (39.7). Greatest lever: Institutional control (80.0, Strong). Entrenchment 58/100; net worth $0bn.

Role
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Country
Italy
Category
Other power broker
Net worth / capital
$0bn
Controls
Humanitarian affairs, Refugees, Multilateral institutions

Dimension read

DimensionValueStandingWhat a high vs low value means — and where Filippo Grandi sits
PII Power & Influence (PII)39.7Developing · #534/635Low here — lower relative influence within this elite set.
▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence  ·  ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set
Economic power Economic power30.0Lagging · #592/635Low here — limited economic control.
▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies  ·  ▼ low: limited economic control
Political power Political power58.0Moderate · #191/635Mid-pack. High would mean commands states, law or policy; low would mean little formal political power.
▲ high: commands states, law or policy  ·  ▼ low: little formal political power
AI power AI power10.0Lagging · #603/635Low here — limited sway over AI's direction.
▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI  ·  ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction
Platform reach Platform reach50.0Moderate · #305/635Mid-pack. High would mean commands a vast audience or network; low would mean limited direct reach.
▲ high: commands a vast audience or network  ·  ▼ low: limited direct reach
Institutional control Institutional control80.0Strong · #118/635High here — controls pivotal institutions and capital.
▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital  ·  ▼ low: limited institutional control
Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure58.0Developing · #435/635Low here — power is contingent — term-limited or contestable.
▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake)  ·  ▼ low: power is contingent — term-limited or contestable

Strengths

  • Institutional control (80.0, Strong) — controls pivotal institutions and capital.

Risk factors

  • Significant but balanced influence with no single dominant lever.
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.