Eyal Zamir
All peopleInfluence report · generated from Eyal Zamir's indicators
Eyal Zamir — full AI read
Eyal Zamir — Chief of the General Staff of the Israel Defense Forces (Israel) — ranks #504/635 on the Power & Influence Index (40.7). Entrenchment 54/100.
Role
Chief of the General Staff of the Israel Defense Forces
Country
Israel
Category
Defense & intelligence
Net worth / capital
—
Controls
Israeli military command; Gaza and Iran operations; regional deterrence
Dimension read
| Dimension | Value | Standing | What a high vs low value means — and where Eyal Zamir sits |
|---|---|---|---|
| PII Power & Influence (PII) | 40.7 | Developing · #503/635 | Low here — lower relative influence within this elite set. ▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence · ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set |
| Economic power Economic power | 22.0 | Lagging · #628/635 | Low here — limited economic control. ▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies · ▼ low: limited economic control |
| Political power Political power | 58.0 | Moderate · #191/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean commands states, law or policy; low would mean little formal political power. ▲ high: commands states, law or policy · ▼ low: little formal political power |
| AI power AI power | 35.0 | Moderate · #368/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean shapes or controls the trajectory of AI; low would mean limited sway over AI's direction. ▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI · ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction |
| Platform reach Platform reach | 42.0 | Developing · #434/635 | Low here — limited direct reach. ▲ high: commands a vast audience or network · ▼ low: limited direct reach |
| Institutional control Institutional control | 76.0 | Moderate · #201/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean controls pivotal institutions and capital; low would mean limited institutional control. ▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital · ▼ low: limited institutional control |
| Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure | 54.0 | Developing · #523/635 | Low here — power is contingent — term-limited or contestable. ▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake) · ▼ low: power is contingent — term-limited or contestable |
Strengths
- No standout dimension.
Risk factors
- Contingent power (tenure 54): term-limited or contestable — influence may fade with office or markets.
▲
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.