David Sacks
All peopleInfluence report · generated from David Sacks's indicators
David Sacks — full AI read
David Sacks — White House AI and Crypto Czar (United States) — ranks #73/635 on the Power & Influence Index (62.1). Greatest lever: AI power (78.0, Leading). Entrenchment 52/100; net worth $2bn.
Role
White House AI and Crypto Czar
Country
United States
Category
Head of state/govt
Net worth / capital
$2bn
Controls
US AI policy coordination, crypto regulation, tech-government bridge
Dimension read
| Dimension | Value | Standing | What a high vs low value means — and where David Sacks sits |
|---|---|---|---|
| PII Power & Influence (PII) | 62.1 | Strong · #73/635 | High here — near the apex of civilizational influence. ▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence · ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set |
| Economic power Economic power | 62.0 | Moderate · #266/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean controls vast wealth and companies; low would mean limited economic control. ▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies · ▼ low: limited economic control |
| Political power Political power | 68.0 | Strong · #84/635 | High here — commands states, law or policy. ▲ high: commands states, law or policy · ▼ low: little formal political power |
| AI power AI power | 78.0 | Leading · #42/635 | High here — shapes or controls the trajectory of AI. ▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI · ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction |
| Platform reach Platform reach | 72.0 | Strong · #72/635 | High here — commands a vast audience or network. ▲ high: commands a vast audience or network · ▼ low: limited direct reach |
| Institutional control Institutional control | 74.0 | Moderate · #232/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean controls pivotal institutions and capital; low would mean limited institutional control. ▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital · ▼ low: limited institutional control |
| Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure | 52.0 | Developing · #543/635 | Low here — power is contingent — term-limited or contestable. ▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake) · ▼ low: power is contingent — term-limited or contestable |
Strengths
- AI power (78.0, Leading) — shapes or controls the trajectory of AI.
- Platform reach (72.0, Strong) — commands a vast audience or network.
- Political power (68.0, Strong) — commands states, law or policy.
Risk factors
- Contingent power (tenure 52): term-limited or contestable — influence may fade with office or markets.
▲
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.