Chase Coleman
All peopleInfluence report · generated from Chase Coleman's indicators
Chase Coleman — full AI read
Chase Coleman — Founder, Tiger Global Management (United States) — ranks #198/635 on the Power & Influence Index (53.0). Greatest lever: Entrenchment / tenure (78.0, Strong). Entrenchment 78/100; net worth $8bn.
Role
Founder, Tiger Global Management
Country
United States
Category
Investor/financier
Net worth / capital
$8bn
Controls
Crossover venture/hedge fund, AI startup backer, growth equity
Dimension read
| Dimension | Value | Standing | What a high vs low value means — and where Chase Coleman sits |
|---|---|---|---|
| PII Power & Influence (PII) | 53.0 | Moderate · #197/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean near the apex of civilizational influence; low would mean lower relative influence within this elite set. ▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence · ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set |
| Economic power Economic power | 68.0 | Strong · #190/635 | High here — controls vast wealth and companies. ▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies · ▼ low: limited economic control |
| Political power Political power | 36.0 | Developing · #484/635 | Low here — little formal political power. ▲ high: commands states, law or policy · ▼ low: little formal political power |
| AI power AI power | 68.0 | Strong · #130/635 | High here — shapes or controls the trajectory of AI. ▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI · ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction |
| Platform reach Platform reach | 42.0 | Developing · #434/635 | Low here — limited direct reach. ▲ high: commands a vast audience or network · ▼ low: limited direct reach |
| Institutional control Institutional control | 66.0 | Moderate · #331/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean controls pivotal institutions and capital; low would mean limited institutional control. ▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital · ▼ low: limited institutional control |
| Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure | 78.0 | Strong · #95/635 | High here — power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake). ▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake) · ▼ low: power is contingent — term-limited or contestable |
Strengths
- Entrenchment / tenure (78.0, Strong) — power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake).
- AI power (68.0, Strong) — shapes or controls the trajectory of AI.
- Economic power (68.0, Strong) — controls vast wealth and companies.
Risk factors
- Significant but balanced influence with no single dominant lever.
▲
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.