CognitiveAristocracy
Detail
Overview / Rankings / People / Assaf Rappaport

Assaf Rappaport

All people
Influence report · generated from Assaf Rappaport's indicators

Assaf Rappaport — full AI read

Assaf Rappaport — Co-founder & CEO, Wiz (Israel) — ranks #328/635 on the Power & Influence Index (47.7). Entrenchment 64/100; net worth $3bn.

Role
Co-founder & CEO, Wiz
Country
Israel
Category
Tech & AI executive
Net worth / capital
$3bn
Controls
cloud security, cybersecurity, enterprise AI

Dimension read

DimensionValueStandingWhat a high vs low value means — and where Assaf Rappaport sits
PII Power & Influence (PII)47.7Moderate · #328/635Mid-pack. High would mean near the apex of civilizational influence; low would mean lower relative influence within this elite set.
▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence  ·  ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set
Economic power Economic power62.0Moderate · #266/635Mid-pack. High would mean controls vast wealth and companies; low would mean limited economic control.
▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies  ·  ▼ low: limited economic control
Political power Political power36.0Developing · #484/635Low here — little formal political power.
▲ high: commands states, law or policy  ·  ▼ low: little formal political power
AI power AI power58.0Moderate · #199/635Mid-pack. High would mean shapes or controls the trajectory of AI; low would mean limited sway over AI's direction.
▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI  ·  ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction
Platform reach Platform reach52.0Moderate · #276/635Mid-pack. High would mean commands a vast audience or network; low would mean limited direct reach.
▲ high: commands a vast audience or network  ·  ▼ low: limited direct reach
Institutional control Institutional control56.0Developing · #497/635Low here — limited institutional control.
▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital  ·  ▼ low: limited institutional control
Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure64.0Moderate · #296/635Mid-pack. High would mean power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake); low would mean power is contingent — term-limited or contestable.
▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake)  ·  ▼ low: power is contingent — term-limited or contestable

Strengths

  • No standout dimension.

Risk factors

  • Significant but balanced influence with no single dominant lever.
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.