Antonio Guterres
All peopleInfluence report · generated from Antonio Guterres's indicators
Antonio Guterres — full AI read
Antonio Guterres — Secretary-General of the United Nations (Portugal) — ranks #155/635 on the Power & Influence Index (55.4). Greatest lever: Institutional control (86.0, Leading). Entrenchment 60/100.
Role
Secretary-General of the United Nations
Country
Portugal
Category
Head of state/govt
Net worth / capital
—
Controls
UN system, AI governance advisory body, multilateral norms, climate, peacekeeping
Dimension read
| Dimension | Value | Standing | What a high vs low value means — and where Antonio Guterres sits |
|---|---|---|---|
| PII Power & Influence (PII) | 55.4 | Strong · #155/635 | High here — near the apex of civilizational influence. ▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence · ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set |
| Economic power Economic power | 38.0 | Lagging · #560/635 | Low here — limited economic control. ▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies · ▼ low: limited economic control |
| Political power Political power | 66.0 | Strong · #99/635 | High here — commands states, law or policy. ▲ high: commands states, law or policy · ▼ low: little formal political power |
| AI power AI power | 52.0 | Moderate · #247/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean shapes or controls the trajectory of AI; low would mean limited sway over AI's direction. ▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI · ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction |
| Platform reach Platform reach | 72.0 | Strong · #72/635 | High here — commands a vast audience or network. ▲ high: commands a vast audience or network · ▼ low: limited direct reach |
| Institutional control Institutional control | 86.0 | Leading · #33/635 | High here — controls pivotal institutions and capital. ▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital · ▼ low: limited institutional control |
| Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure | 60.0 | Moderate · #371/635 | Mid-pack. High would mean power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake); low would mean power is contingent — term-limited or contestable. ▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake) · ▼ low: power is contingent — term-limited or contestable |
Strengths
- Institutional control (86.0, Leading) — controls pivotal institutions and capital.
- Platform reach (72.0, Strong) — commands a vast audience or network.
- Political power (66.0, Strong) — commands states, law or policy.
Risk factors
- Significant but balanced influence with no single dominant lever.
▲
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.