Overview / Rankings / People / A.G. Sulzberger

A.G. Sulzberger

Influence report · generated from A.G. Sulzberger's indicators

A.G. Sulzberger — full AI read

A.G. Sulzberger — Chairman & Publisher, The New York Times (United States) — ranks #192/635 on the Power & Influence Index (53.4). Greatest lever: Platform reach (80.0, Leading). Entrenchment 80/100; net worth $0bn.

Role

Chairman & Publisher, The New York Times

Country

United States

Dimension read

Dimension	Value	Standing	What a high vs low value means — and where A.G. Sulzberger sits
PII Power & Influence (PII)	53.4	Moderate · #191/635	Mid-pack. High would mean near the apex of civilizational influence; low would mean lower relative influence within this elite set. ▲ high: near the apex of civilizational influence · ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set
Economic power Economic power	48.0	Developing · #470/635	Low here — limited economic control. ▲ high: controls vast wealth and companies · ▼ low: limited economic control
Political power Political power	58.0	Moderate · #191/635	Mid-pack. High would mean commands states, law or policy; low would mean little formal political power. ▲ high: commands states, law or policy · ▼ low: little formal political power
AI power AI power	30.0	Moderate · #394/635	Mid-pack. High would mean shapes or controls the trajectory of AI; low would mean limited sway over AI's direction. ▲ high: shapes or controls the trajectory of AI · ▼ low: limited sway over AI's direction
Platform reach Platform reach	80.0	Leading · #43/635	High here — commands a vast audience or network. ▲ high: commands a vast audience or network · ▼ low: limited direct reach
Institutional control Institutional control	74.0	Moderate · #232/635	Mid-pack. High would mean controls pivotal institutions and capital; low would mean limited institutional control. ▲ high: controls pivotal institutions and capital · ▼ low: limited institutional control
Entrenchment / tenure Entrenchment / tenure	80.0	Strong · #67/635	High here — power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake). ▲ high: power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake) · ▼ low: power is contingent — term-limited or contestable

Strengths

Platform reach (80.0, Leading) — commands a vast audience or network.
Entrenchment / tenure (80.0, Strong) — power is locked in (indefinite or controlling stake).

Risk factors

Significant but balanced influence with no single dominant lever.

▲

These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.