Hailey Schoelkopf
All AI mindsAI advancement report · generated from Hailey Schoelkopf's indicators
Hailey Schoelkopf — full AI read
Hailey Schoelkopf — Research Scientist; lead of lm-evaluation-harness, EleutherAI (United States) — ranks #278/520 on the AI Advancement Index (70.1). Known for Lead maintainer of EleutherAI's lm-evaluation-harness, the standard framework for benchmarking LLMs (basis of the Open LLM Leaderboard); contributor to Pythia and open LLM training. Strongest on Field-building (80.0, Strong).
Role
Research Scientist; lead of lm-evaluation-harness
Affiliation
EleutherAI
Country
United States
Field
Open-source & tools
Known for
Lead maintainer of EleutherAI's lm-evaluation-harness, the standard framework for benchmarking LLMs (basis of the Open LLM Leaderboard); contributor to Pythia and open LLM training
Dimension read
| Dimension | Value | Standing | What a high vs low value means — and where Hailey Schoelkopf sits |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAI AI Advancement (AAI) | 70.1 | Moderate · #278/520 | Mid-pack. High would mean among the very top minds advancing AI; low would mean lower relative influence within this elite set. ▲ high: among the very top minds advancing AI · ▼ low: lower relative influence within this elite set |
| Research influence Research influence | 62.0 | Developing · #402/520 | Low here — limited direct research influence. ▲ high: field-defining research contributions · ▼ low: limited direct research influence |
| Frontier role Frontier role | 68.0 | Moderate · #264/520 | Mid-pack. High would mean central to building today's frontier AI; low would mean removed from frontier development. ▲ high: central to building today's frontier AI · ▼ low: removed from frontier development |
| Thought leadership Thought leadership | 62.0 | Moderate · #313/520 | Mid-pack. High would mean shapes how the field and public think about AI; low would mean limited public/field influence. ▲ high: shapes how the field and public think about AI · ▼ low: limited public/field influence |
| Field-building Field-building | 80.0 | Strong · #90/520 | High here — builds the field — mentorship, institutions, tools, community. ▲ high: builds the field — mentorship, institutions, tools, community · ▼ low: limited field-building footprint |
| Momentum Momentum | 82.0 | Moderate · #159/520 | Mid-pack. High would mean driving AI's advancement right now; low would mean less active at the current frontier. ▲ high: driving AI's advancement right now · ▼ low: less active at the current frontier |
Strengths
- Field-building (80.0, Strong) — builds the field — mentorship, institutions, tools, community.
Risk factors
- A significant, well-rounded contributor to AI's advancement.
▲
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.